CONC 4.2 Pre-contract disclosure and adequate explanations
Application
This section, unless otherwise stated in or in relation to a rule:
- (1)
applies to a firm with respect to consumer credit lending;
- (2)
applies to a firm with respect to credit broking where the firm has or takes on responsibility for providing the disclosures and explanations to customers required by this section;
- (3)
does not apply to an agreement under which the lender provides the customer with credit which exceeds £60,260, unless the agreement is a residential renovation agreement5;
- (4)
does not apply to an agreement secured on land; and
- (5)
does not apply to a borrower-lender agreement enabling the customer to overdraw on a current account other than such an agreement which would be an authorised non-business overdraft agreement, but for the fact that the credit is not repayable on demand or within three months.
[Note: section 74(1D) of CCA]
For the agreements referred to in CONC 4.2.1R (3), (4) and (5), a firm within CONC 4.2.1R (1) or CONC 4.2.1R (2) should consider whether it is necessary or appropriate to provide explanations of the matters in CONC 4.2.5R (2); in particular, a firm should consider highlighting the principal consequences to the customer including the consequences of missing payments or under-paying, including, where applicable, the risk of repossession of the customer's property.
[Note: section 55A(6) of CCA and paragraphs 3.1(box) of ILG]
3Other disclosure requirements
- (1)
The disclosure regulations made under section 55 of the CCA which require information to be disclosed before a regulated credit agreement is made remain in force.
- (2)
Failure to comply with the disclosure regulations has the effect that agreements are enforceable against a borrower or hirer (as defined in the CCA) only with an order of court and enforcement for that purpose includes a retaking of goods or land to which the agreement relates.
- (3)
Other relevant disclosure requirements are found in CONC 2.7 (distance marketing) and CONC 2.8 (electronic commerce), the Financial Services (Distance Marketing) Regulations 2004 (SI 2004/2095), the Electronic Commerce (EC Directive) Regulations 2002 (SI 2002/2013) and the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (SI 2008/ 1277) and the Cancellation of Contracts made in the Consumer’s home etc Regulations 2008 (SI 2008/1816).
The pre-contractual information disclosed under the disclosure regulations and the pre-contractual explanations required under CONC 4.2.5 R should take into account any preferences expressed, or information provided by, the customer where the firm would in principle agree to offer credit on such terms
[Note: paragraph 3.13 (box) of ILG]
Pre-contractual adequate explanations
- (1)
Before making a regulated credit agreement the firm must:
- (a)
provide the customer with an adequate explanation of the matters referred to in (2) in order to place the customer in a position to assess whether the agreement is adapted to the customer's needs and financial situation;
- (b)
advise the customer:
- (c)
provide the customer with an opportunity to ask questions about the agreement; and
- (d)
advise the customer how to ask the firm for further information and explanation.
[Note: section 55A(1) of CCA]
- (a)
- (2)
The matters referred to in (1)(a) are:
- (a)
the features of the agreement which may make the credit to be provided under the agreement unsuitable for particular types of use;
- (b)
how much the customer will have to pay periodically and, where the amount can be determined, in total under the agreement;
- (c)
the features of the agreement which may operate in a manner which would have a significant adverse effect on the customer in a way which the customer is unlikely to foresee;
- (d)
the principal consequences for the customer arising from a failure to make payments under the agreement at the times required by the agreement including, where applicable and depending upon the type and amount of credit and the circumstances of the customer:
- (i)
the total cost of the debt growing;
- (ii)
incurring any default charges or interest for late or missed payment or under-payment;
- (iii)
impaired credit rating and its effect on future access to or cost of credit;
- (iv)
legal proceedings, including reference to charging orders (or, in Scotland, inhibitions), and to the associated costs of such proceedings;
- (v)
repossession of the customer's home or other property; and
- (vi)
where an article is taken in pawn, that the article might be sold, if not redeemed; and
- (i)
- (e)
the effect of the exercise of any right to withdraw from the agreement and how and when this right may be exercised.
- (a)
- (3)
The adequate explanation and advice in (1) may be given orally or in writing, except where (4) applies.
[Note: section 55A(3) of CCA]
- (4)
Where the matters in (2)(a), (b) or (e) are given orally or to the customer in person, the explanation of the matters in (2)(c) and (d) and the advice required in (1)(b) must be given orally to the customer.
[Note: section 55A(4) of CCA]
- (5)
Paragraphs (1) to (4) do not apply to a lender if a credit broker has complied with those sub-paragraphs in respect of the agreement.
[Note: section 55A(5) of CCA]
- (6)
Where the regulated credit agreement is an agreement under which a person4 takes an article in pawn:
- (a)
the requirement in (1)(a) only relates to the matters in (2)(d) and (e); and
- (b)
the requirements in (1)(b) and (d) do not apply.
[Note: section 55A(7) of CCA]
- (a)
- (7)
This rule does not apply to:
- (a)
- (b)
a small borrower-lender-supplier agreement for restricted-use credit
[Note: section 74(1) of CCA]
- (8)
[deleted]6
- (9)
[deleted]6
[Note: article 5(6) of the Consumer Credit Directive]
The explanation provided by a lender or a credit broker under CONC 4.2.5 R should enable the customer to make a reasonable assessment as to whether the customer can afford the credit and to understand the key associated risks.
[Note: paragraph 3.3 (box) of ILG]
In deciding on the level and extent of explanation required by CONC 4.2.5 R, the lender or credit broker should consider (and each of them should ensure that anyone acting on its behalf should consider), to the extent appropriate to do so, factors including:
- (1)
the type of credit being sought;
- (2)
- (2A)
- (2B)
the risk to the customer arising from the credit (the risk to the customer is likely to be greater the higher the total cost of the credit relative to the customer’s financial situation);4
- (2C)
the purpose of the credit, if the lender or (as the case may be) the credit broker knows what that purpose is;4
- (3)
to the extent it is evident and discernible, the customer's level of understanding of the agreement, and of the information and4 the explanation provided about the agreement4; and
- (4)
the channel or medium through which the credit1 transaction takes place.
[Note: paragraph 3.4 of ILG]
1
- (1)
4CONC 4.2.5R(1) requires the customer to be provided with an adequate explanation of the matters in CONC 4.2.5R(2). Where there is more than one customer acting together as ‘joint borrowers’, the lender or credit broker should consider whether it may be appropriate to give separate explanations to each customer and whether the explanation should be the same or different for each, rather than giving a single explanation to all of them jointly. (Where the borrower is a partnership or an unincorporated association, the members or partners may be treated as a single customer.)
- (2)
In deciding whether it is appropriate to give separate explanations to each customer, and in determining the level and extent of explanation required for each customer, the lender or credit broker should consider the factors in CONC 4.2.7G separately for each customer.
- (3)
However, CONC 4.2.5R(4) does not require an oral explanation of the matters in CONC 4.2.5R(2)(c) and (d) to be given to one customer simply because an oral explanation of the matters in CONC 4.2.5R(2)(a), (b) or (e) was given to a different customer.
Where the regulated credit agreement is high-cost short-term credit, the lender or a credit broker must explain under CONC 4.2.5R (1)(a) that entering into that agreement would be unsuitable to support sustained borrowing over long periods and would be expensive as a means of longer term borrowing.
[Note: paragraph 3.13 (box) of ILG]
Even where a customer states or implies that there is no need for an explanation of the regulated credit agreement, the lender or credit broker must continue to comply with CONC 4.2.5 R.
[Note: paragraph 3.10 of ILG]
A lender or a credit broker must not encourage or induce a customer to waive the rights in CONC 4.2.5 R.
[Note: paragraph 3.10 of ILG]
Before a lender concludes that CONC 4.2.5R (1) to CONC 4.2.5R (4) do not apply to it in relation to a regulated credit agreement by virtue of CONC 4.2.5R (5), the lender must take reasonable steps to satisfy itself that an explanation of that agreement complying with CONC 4.2.5 R has been provided to the customer by the credit broker.
[Note: paragraph 3.11 (box) of ILG]
The lender or the credit broker must enable a customer to request and obtain further information and explanation about a regulated credit agreement without incurring undue cost or delay.
[Note: paragraph 3.16 (box) of ILG]
Neither a lender nor a credit broker may require a customer to acknowledge that the information and explanations it has provided are adequate to satisfy the requirements of CONC 4.2.5 R.
[Note: paragraph 3.30 (box) of ILG]
A lender or credit broker may require an acknowledgement that it has provided an explanation, and of receipt of any written information that forms a part of the explanation, but not an acknowledgement as to its adequacy. CONC 4.2.13 R does not prevent the lender or credit broker asking if the customer has understood an explanation given.
[Note: paragraph 3.30 (box) of ILG]
Adequate explanations in relation to particular regulated credit agreements
The following information must be provided by the lender or a credit broker as part of, and in addition to that provided under, the adequate explanation required by CONC 4.2.5 R, where applicable, in the specified cases:
- (1)
- (a)
different rates of interest and different charges apply to different elements of the credit provided (for example, a higher cost of withdrawing cash);
- (b)
the implications of only making minimum repayments;
- (c)
interest rates or charges2 may be increased;
- (d)
where applicable, the interest rates may be increased based on the risks presented by the individual customer;
- (e)
the limitations on any zero percentage or low interest or other introductory offer; and
- (f)
conditions on any balance transfers, including any fees and charges which may apply;
- (a)
- (2)
for credit card cheques, the higher associated costs relative to payment by credit card;
- (3)
for home credit loan agreements and high-cost short-term credit, the effect of refinancing (within the meaning in CONC 6.7.17 R) or otherwise extending the duration of the credit or of the credit agreement;
- (4)
for bill of sale loan agreements:
- (a)
the risk of losing the asset which is the subject of the bill of sale and the loss this could entail;
- (b)
that repossession can take place without a court order;
- (c)
that repossession may not clear the debt owed; and
- (d)
unlike in the case of hire-purchase agreements and conditional sale agreements, the customer is not protected under this arrangement from repossession of the asset where one third or more of the total amount payable has been paid off;
- (a)
- (5)
for hire purchase agreements and conditional sale agreements:
- (a)
the customer does not own the goods until the sums required under the agreements have been paid, including any option to purchase fee and any other conditions have been satisfied;
- (b)
goods can be repossessed without a court order in the event of default, unless in relation to a regulated credit agreement the customer has paid a third or more of the total amount payable;
- (a)
- (6)
for a credit agreement which is used to consolidate existing debts of the customer (whether to the same lender or to another person) and where applicable in each case:
- (a)
the effect of consolidating the debts will involve payment of a higher rate of interest or charges or both (if the relevant information about existing debts is known to the lender or credit broker);
- (b)
the effect of consolidating the debts will involve increasing the period required for repayment (if the relevant information about existing debts is known to the lender or credit broker); and
- (c)
the credit agreement would be secured on the customer's property;
- (a)
- (7)
for a credit agreement which includes a condition requiring a guarantor, the requirement for the customer to provide security in the form of a guarantee.
[Note: paragraph 4.26c of CBG]
[Note: paragraph 3.13 of ILG]
Where a customer does not have a good understanding of the English language, the lender or credit broker may need to consider alternative methods of providing relevant information concerning the explanation required by CONC 4.2.5 R in order for the customer to make an informed decision, such as, providing the information to a person with such understanding who can assist the customer, for example, a friend or relative.
[Note: paragraph 3.4 (box) of ILG]
Guidance for adequate explanations where agreements are marketed by distance or electronic means
Since the use of distance means of communication (such as the internet) by their nature limit the lender's or credit broker's ability to ascertain the customer's level of understanding of explanations provided, a lender or credit broker using those means may, for example, wish to provide local rate telephone number for customers who wish to seek further explanation.
[Note: paragraph 3.6 (box) of ILG]
Interaction is an important part of compliance with the requirement in CONC 4.2.5R (1), for example, where the agreement is marketed and concluded by electronic means. For an online application, the requirement in CONC 4.2.5R (1)(c) (the right to ask questions) may be complied with by the customer being able to access an appropriately comprehensive set of answers to frequently asked questions about the agreement or by being able to speak to a representative of the online provider.
[Note: paragraph 3.8 (box) of ILG]
For a regulated credit agreement marketed and concluded by electronic means to comply with CONC 4.2.5 R the customer should pass through screens containing the required information and explanations, giving the customer the opportunity to see and read the explanations provided. Merely providing a link to where such information can be found is unlikely to satisfy the requirements in CONC 4.2.5 R, where the agreement can be concluded without accessing the link.
[Note: paragraph 3.15 (box) of ILG]
For telephone or face-to-face transactions, interaction between the customer and the firm's representative is also important. It should be made clear to the customer that the customer can ask questions or request further information or explanation and, for example, the representative solely providing the customer with a written explanation of an agreement, or relying solely on a written script in relation to an agreement, is unlikely to comply with the requirement in CONC 4.2.5 R.
[Note: paragraph 3.9 (box) of ILG]
Where a regulated credit agreement is a modifying agreement under section 82(2) of the CCA, the requirements in CONC 4.2 apply before the agreement is made.
[Note: paragraph 3.12 of ILG]
Credit agreements where there is a guarantor etc
- (1)
- (a)
a firm is to enter into a regulated credit agreement; and
- (b)
an individual other than the borrower (in this rule referred to as “the guarantor”) is to provide a guarantee or an indemnity (or both) in relation to the regulated credit agreement.
- (a)
- (2)
The firm must, before making the regulated credit agreement, provide the guarantor with an adequate explanation of the matters in (3) in order to place the guarantor in a position to make an informed decision as to whether to act as the guarantor in relation to the regulated credit agreement.
- (3)
The matters are:
- (a)
the circumstances in which the guarantee or the indemnity (or both) might be called on; and
- (b)
the implications for the guarantor of the guarantee or the indemnity (or both) being called on.
- (a)
- (4)
For the purposes of (2), the rules and guidance listed in (5) apply as if:
- (a)
references to the customer were references to the guarantor; and
- (b)
references to CONC 4.2.5R were references to this rule.
- (a)
- (5)
- (a)
- (b)
CONC 4.2.9R and CONC 4.2.10R;
- (c)
CONC 4.2.12R to CONC 4.2.14G; and
- (d)
- (6)
For the purposes of this rule, a guarantee does not include a legal or equitable mortgage or a pledge.
- (1)
4CONC 4.2.22R does not apply to a lender if a credit broker, a solicitor, a barrister, (in Scotland) an advocate, or a relevant person has complied with that rule in respect of the agreement.
- (2)
Before a lender concludes that CONC 4.2.22R does not apply to it in relation to a regulated credit agreement by virtue of (1), the lender must take reasonable steps to satisfy itself that:
- (a)
an explanation complying with CONC 4.2.22R(2) has been provided to the guarantor; and
- (b)
the following had been provided to the person giving the explanation, before the explanation was given:
- (i)
a copy of the agreement;
- (ii)
if the guarantee or the indemnity (or both) is contained in a document other than the agreement, a copy of that document; and
- (iii)
a copy of any other document or information in writing relating to the agreement which had been provided to the guarantor by the lender or the credit broker.
- (i)
- (a)
- (3)
In this rule, “relevant person” means a person who, for the purposes of the Legal Services Act 2007, is an authorised person in relation to an activity which constitutes the exercise of a right of audience or the conduct of litigation (within the meaning of that Act), and is not a solicitor, a barrister or (in Scotland) an advocate.
4CONC 4.2.23R permits the explanation required by CONC 4.2.22R to be given by a credit broker. It also permits the explanation to be given by a solicitor, a barrister, a Scottish advocate or another “relevant person” (for example, in the course of giving independent legal advice to the guarantor). The explanation may only be given by such a person if the information and documents listed in that rule had been provided to that person.