Related provisions for CREDS 2.2.9

CREDS 2.2.11G08/01/2012

(1) The term 'internal audit function' in CREDS 2.2.10 E refers to the generally understood concept of internal audit within a firm, in other words the function of assessing adherence to and the effectiveness of internal systems and controls, procedures and policies. The internal audit function is not a controlled function itself, but is part of the systems and controls function (CF28). (2) Guidance on internal audit is given in CREDS 2.2.40 G to CREDS 2.2.50 G.

SYSC 3.2.4G01/12/2001

(1) The guidance relevant to delegation within the firm is also relevant to external delegation ('outsourcing'). A firm cannot contract out its regulatory obligations. So, for example, under Principle 3 a firm should take reasonable care to supervise the discharge of outsourced functions by its contractor.(2) A firm should take steps to obtain sufficient information from its contractor to enable it to assess the impact of outsourcing on its systems and controls.

SYSC 3.2.6EG01/04/2013

5The FCA, when considering whether a breach of its rules on systems and controls against money laundering has occurred, will have regard to whether a firm has followed relevant provisions in the guidance for the UK financial sector issued by the Joint Money Laundering Steering Group.

SYSC 6.3.5G01/04/2013

The FCA, when considering whether a breach of its rules on systems and controls against money laundering has occurred, will have regard to whether a firm has followed relevant provisions in the guidance for the United Kingdom financial sector issued by the Joint Money Laundering Steering Group.1

SYSC 19C.3.6G01/01/2014

(1)
In the FCA's view:
1. (a)
  a firm's staff includes its employees;
2. (b)
  a person who performs a significant influence function for, or is a senior manager of, a firm would normally be expected to be part of the firm's BIPRU Remuneration Code staff;
3. (c)
  the table in (2) provides a non-exhaustive list of examples of key positions that should, subject to (d), be within a firm's definition of staff who are risk takers;
4. (d)
  firms should consider how the examples in the table in (2) apply to their own organisational structure (as the description of suggested business lines in the first row may be most appropriate to a firm which deals on its own account to a significant extent);
5. (e)
  firms may find it useful to set their own metrics to identify their risk takers based, for example, on trading limits; and
6. (f)
  a firm should treat a person as being BIPRU Remuneration Code staff in relation to remuneration in respect of a given performance year if they were BIPRU Remuneration Code staff for any part of that year.
[Note: The FCA has published guidance on the application of particular rules on remuneration structures in relation to individuals who are BIPRU Remuneration Code staff for only part of a given performance year. This guidance is available at
http://www.fca.org.uk/firms/markets/international-markets/remuneration-code
.]

(2)

High-level category	Suggested business lines
Heads of significant business lines (including regional heads) and any individuals or groups within their control who have a material impact on the firm's risk profile	Fixed income Foreign exchange Commodities Securitisation Sales areas Investment banking (including mergers and acquisitions advisory) Commercial banking Equities Structured finance Lending quality Trading areas Research
Heads of support and control functions and other individuals within their control who have a material impact on the firm's risk profile	Credit/market/operational risk Legal Treasury controls Human resources Compliance Internal audit

High-level category

Suggested business lines

Heads of significant business lines (including regional heads) and any individuals or groups within their control who have a material impact on the firm's risk profile

Fixed income

Foreign exchange

Commodities

Securitisation

Sales areas

Investment banking (including mergers and acquisitions advisory)

Commercial banking

Equities

Structured finance

Lending quality

Trading areas

Research

Heads of support and control functions and other individuals within their control who have a material impact on the firm's risk profile

Credit/market/operational risk

Legal

Treasury controls

Human resources

Compliance

Internal audit

SYSC 19C.3.12R01/01/2014

(1) A firm that is significant in terms of its size, internal organisation and the nature, scope and complexity of its activities must establish a remuneration committee. (2) The remuneration committee must be constituted in a way that enables it to exercise competent and independent judgment on remuneration policies and practices and the incentives created for managing risk, capital and liquidity. (3) The chairman and the members of the remuneration committee must be members

SYSC 2.1.6G01/04/2013

Frequently asked questions about allocation of functions in SYSC 2.1.3 R

This table belongs to SYSC 2.1.5 G

	Question	Answer
1	Does an individual to whom a function is allocated under SYSC 2.1.3 R need to be an approved person?	An individual to whom a function is allocated under SYSC 2.1.3 R will be performing the apportionment and oversight function (CF 8, see SUP 10A.7.1 R15) and an application must be made under section 59 of the Act for approval of the individual before the function is performed. There are exceptions from this inSUP 10A.115 (Approved persons - Application). 15 15 5
2	If the allocation is to more than one individual, can they perform the functions, or aspects of the functions, separately?	If the functions are allocated to joint chief executives under SYSC 2.1.4 R, column 2, they are expected to act jointly. If the functions are allocated to an individual under SYSC 2.1.4 R, column 2, in addition to individuals under SYSC 2.1.4 R, column 3, the former may normally be expected to perform a leading role in relation to the functions that reflects his position. Otherwise, yes.
3	What is meant by "appropriately allocate" in this context?	The allocation of functions should be compatible with delivering compliance with Principle 3, SYSC 2.1.1 R and SYSC 3.1.1 R. The appropriate regulator considers that allocation to one or two individuals is likely to be appropriate for most firms.
4	If a committee of management governs a firm or group, can the functions be allocated to every member of that committee?	Yes, as long as the allocation remains appropriate (see Question 3).If the firm also has an individual as chief executive, then the functions must be allocated to that individual as well under SYSC 2.1.4 R, column 2 (see Question 7).
5	Does the definition of chief executive include the possessor of equivalent responsibilities with another title, such as a managing director or managing partner?	Yes.
6	Is it possible for a firm to have more than one individual as its chief executive?	Although unusual, some firm may wish the responsibility of a chief executive to be held jointly by more than one individual. In that case, each of them will be a chief executive and the functions must be allocated to all of them under SYSC 2.1.4 R, column 2 (see also Questions 2 and 7).
7	If a firm has an individual as chief executive, must the functions be allocated to that individual?	Normally, yes, under SYSC 2.1.4 R, column 2. But if the firm is a body corporate and a member of a group, the functions may, instead of to the firm's chief executive, be allocated to a director or senior manager from the group responsible for the overall management of the group or of a relevant group division, so long as this is appropriate (see Question 3). Such individuals may nevertheless require approval under section 59 (see Question 1). If the firm chooses to allocate the functions to a director or senior manager responsible for the overall management of a relevant group division, the appropriate regulator would expect that individual to be of a seniority equivalent to or greater than a chief executive of the firm for the allocation to be appropriate. See also Question 14.
8	If a firm has a chief executive, can the functions be allocated to other individuals in addition to the chief executive?	Yes. SYSC 2.1.4 R, column 3, permits a firm to allocate the functions, additionally, to the firm's (or where applicable the group's) directors and senior managers as long as this is appropriate (see Question 3).
9	What if a firm does not have a chief executive?	Normally, the functions must be allocated to one or more individuals selected from the firm's (or where applicable the group's) directors and senior managers under SYSC 2.1.4 R, column 3. But if the firm: (1) is a body corporate and a member of a group; and (2) the group has a director or senior manager responsible for the overall management of the group or of a relevant group division; then the functions must be allocated to that individual (together, optionally, with individuals from column 3 if appropriate) under SYSC 2.1.4 R, column 2.2
10	What do you mean by "group division within which some or all of the firm's regulated activities fall"?	A "division" in this context should be interpreted by reference to geographical operations, product lines or any other method by which the group's business is divided. If the firm's regulated activities fall within more than one division and the firm does not wish to allocate the functions to its chief executive, the allocation must, under SYSC 2.1.4 R, be to: (1) a director or senior manager responsible for the overall management of the group; or (2) a director or senior manager responsible for the overall management of one of those divisions; together, optionally, with individuals from column 3 if appropriate. (See also Questions 7 and 9.)
11	How does the requirement to allocate the functions in SYSC 2.1.3R apply to an overseas firm which is not an incoming EEA firm, incoming Treaty firm or UCITS qualifier?	The firm must appropriately allocate those functions to one or more individuals, in accordance with SYSC 2.1.4 R, but: (1) The responsibilities that must be apportioned and the systems and controls that must be overseen are those relating to activities carried on from a UK establishment with certain exceptions (see SYSC 1 Annex 1.1.7 R)6. Note that SYSC 1 Annex 1.1.10 R6 does not extend the territorial scope of SYSC 2 for an overseas firm. (2) The chief executive of an overseas firm is the person responsible for the conduct of the firm's business within the United Kingdom (see the definition of "chief executive"). This might, for example, be the manager of the firm's UK establishment, or it might be the chief executive of the firm as a whole, if he has that responsibility. The apportionment and oversight function applies to such a firm, unless it falls within a particular exception from the approved persons regime (see Question 1). 6 6
12	How does the requirement to allocate the functions in SYSC 2.1.3R apply to an incoming EEA firm or incoming Treaty firm?	SYSC 1 Annex 1.1.1R6and SYSC 1 Annex 1.1.8 R6restrict the application of SYSC 2.1.3 R for such a firm. Accordingly: (1) Such a firm is not required to allocate the function of dealing with apportionment in SYSC 2.1.3 R (1). (2) Such a firm is required to allocate the function of oversight in SYSC 2.1.3 R (2). However, the systems and controls that must be overseen are those relating to matters which the appropriate regulator, as Host State regulator, is entitled to regulate (there is guidance on this in SUP 13A Annex 2 G3). Those are primarily, but not exclusively, the systems and controls relating to the conduct of the firm's activities carried on from its UK branch. (3) Such a firm need not allocate the function of oversight to its chief executive; it must allocate it to one or more directors and senior managers of the firm or the firm's group under SYSC 2.1.4 R, row (2). (4) An incoming EEA firm which has provision only for cross border services is not required to allocate either function if it does not carry on regulated activities in the United Kingdom; for example if they fall within the overseas persons exclusions in article 72 of the Regulated Activities Order. See also Questions 1 and 15.1 6 6 3
13	What about a firm that is a partnership or a limited liability partnership?	The appropriate regulator envisages that most if not all partners or members will be either directors or senior managers, but this will depend on the constitution of the partnership (particularly in the case of a limited partnership) or limited liability partnership. A partnership or limited liability partnership may also have a chief executive (see Question 5). A limited liability partnership is a body corporate and, if a member of a group, will fall within SYSC 2.1.4 R, row (1) or (2).
14	What if generally accepted principles of good corporate governance recommend that the chief executive should not be involved in an aspect of corporate governance?	The Note to SYSC 2.1.4 R provides that the chief executive or other executive director or senior manager need not be involved in such circumstances. For example, the UK Corporate Governance Code 7 recommends that the board of a listed company should establish an audit committee of non-executive directors to be responsible for oversight of the audit. That aspect of the oversight function may therefore be allocated to the members of such a committee without involving the chief executive. Such individuals may require approval under section 59 in relation to that function (see Question 1). 7
15	What about electronic commerce activities carried on from an establishment in another EEA State with or for a person in the United Kingdom?4 4	SYSC does not apply to an incoming ECA provider acting as such.1 4

SYSC 13.2.1G31/12/2006

SYSC 13 provides guidance on how to interpret SYSC 3.1.1 R and SYSC 3.2.6 R, which deal with the establishment and maintenance of systems and controls, in relation to the management of operational risk. Operational risk has been described by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision as "the risk of loss, resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems, or from external events". This chapter covers systems and controls for managing risks concerning any

DEPP 6.2.1G01/04/2013

The FCA4 will consider the full circumstances of each case when determining whether or not to take action for a financial penalty or public censure. Set out below is a list of factors that may be relevant for this purpose. The list is not exhaustive: not all of these factors may be applicable in a particular case, and there may be other factors, not listed, that are relevant.4(1) The nature, seriousness and impact of the suspected breach, including:(a) whether the breach was deliberate

SUP 16.12.11R01/01/2014

The applicable data items referred to in SUP 16.12.4 R are set out according to firm type in the table below:

Description of data item	45 Firms' prudential category and applicable data items(note 1)
	IFPRU investment firms and BIPRU firms		Firmsother thanBIPRU firms or IFPRU investment firms
	IFPRU	BIPRU	IPRU(INV)Chapter 3	IPRU(INV)Chapter 5	IPRU(INV)Chapter 9	IPRU(INV)Chapter 13	UPRU
Annual report and accounts	No standard format		No standard format (note 19)	No standard format		No standard format (Note 13)44	No standard format
Annual report and accounts of the mixed-activity holding company (note 10)	No standard format
Solvency statement	No standard format (note 11)		No standard format (note 20)	No standard format (note 11)			No standard format (note 11)
Balance sheet	FSA001/FINREP (note 36)	FSA001 (Note 2)	FSA029 (note 18)	FSA029	FSA029	FSA029 (note 15) or Section A RMAR (note 15)	FSA029
Income statement	FSA001/FINREP (note 36)	FSA002 (Note 2)	FSA030 (note 18)	FSA030	FSA030	FSA030 (note 15) or Section B RMAR (note 15)	FSA030
Capital adequacy	COREP (Note 36)	FSA003 (Note 2)	FSA033 (note 18)	FSA034 or FSA035 (note 14)	FSA031	FSA032 (note 15) or Section D6RMAR (note 15)	FSA036
Supplementary capital data for collective portfolio management investment firms	FIN067 (Note 35)	FIN068 (Note 35)
Credit risk	COREP (Note 36)	FSA004 (Notes 2, 3)
Market risk	COREP (Note 36)	FSA005 (Notes 2, 4)
Market risk - supplementary	FSA006 (note 5)	FSA006 (Note 5)
Operational risk	COREP (Note 36)
Large exposures	COREP (Note 36)
Exposures between core UK group and non-core large exposures group	FSA018 (note 12)
Solo consolidation data	FSA016 (note 25)	FSA016 (Note 25)
Pillar 2 questionnaire	FSA019 (note 8)	FSA019 (Note 8)
Non-EEA sub-group	COREP (Note 36)	FSA028 (Note 9)
Threshold conditions						Section F RMAR (Note 15)
Client money and client assets	FSA039	FSA039	FSA039 (note 18)	FSA039	FSA039	Section C RMAR (Note 15) or FSA039	FSA039
CFTC	FSA040 (note 24)	FSA040 (Note 24)	FSA040 (note 24)	FSA040 (note 24)	FSA040 (note 24)	FSA040 (note 24)	FSA040 (note 24)
IRB portfolio risk	FSA045 (note 22)	FSA045 (Note 22)
Securitisation: non-trading book	COREP (Note 36)	FSA046 (Note 23)
Daily Flows	FSA047/COREP (Notes 26, 29 , 31, 33, and 36)
Enhanced Mismatch Report	FSA048/COREP (Notes 26, 29 , 31, 33, and 36)
Liquidity Buffer Qualifying Securities	FSA050/COREP (Notes 27, 30, 31, 33, and 36)
Funding Concentration	FSA051/COREP (Notes 27, 30, 31, 33, and 36)
Pricing data	FSA052/COREP (Notes 27, 31, 33, 34, and 36)
Retail and corporate funding	FSA053/COREP (Notes 27, 30, 31, 33, and 36)
Currency Analysis	FSA054/COREP (Notes 27, 30, 31, 33, and 36)
Systems and Controls Questionnaire	FSA055/COREP (Notes 28, 33, and 36)	FSA055 (Notes 28 and 33)
Securitisation: trading book	COREP (Note 36)
Note 1	All firms, except IFPRU investment firms in relation to data items reported under the EU CRR, when submitting the completed data item required, a firm must use the format of the data item set out in SUP 16 Annex 24. Guidance notes for completion of the data items are contained in SUP 16 Annex 25.
Note 2	Firms that are members of a UK consolidation group are also required to submit this report on a UK consolidation group basis.
Note 3	This applies to a firm that is required to submit data item FSA003 and, at any time within the 12 months up to its latest accounting reference date ("the relevant period"), was reporting data item FSA004 ("Firm A") or not reporting this item ("Firm B"). In the case of Firm A it must report this data item if one or both of its last two submissions in the relevant period show that the threshold was exceeded. In the case of Firm B it must report this item if both the last two submissions in the relevant period show that the threshold has been exceeded. The threshold is exceeded where data element 77A in data item FSA003 is greater than £10 million, or its currency equivalent, at the relevant reporting date for the firm.
Note 4	This applies to a firm that is required to submit data item FSA003 and, at anytime within the 12 months up to its latest accounting reference date ("the relevant period"), was reporting data item FSA005 ("Firm A") or not reporting this item ("Firm B"). In the case of Firm A it must report this data item if one or both of its last two submissions in the relevant period show that the threshold was exceeded. In the case of Firm B it must report this item if both the last two submissions in the relevant period show that the threshold has been exceeded. The threshold is exceeded where data element 93A in data item FSA003 is greater than £50 million, or its currency equivalent, at the relevant reporting date for the firm.
Note 5	Only applicable to firms with a VaR model permission.
Note 6	[deleted]
Note 7	[deleted]
Note 8	Only applicable to IFPRU investment firms and BIPRU firms that: (a) are subject to consolidated supervision under BIPRU 8, except those that are either included within the consolidated supervision of a group that includes a UK credit institution, or that have been granted an investment firm consolidation waiver; or (b) have been granted an investment firm consolidation waiver ;or (c) are not subject to consolidated supervision under BIPRU 8. An IFPRU investment firm and a BIPRU firm under (a) must complete the report on the basis of its UK consolidation group. An IFPRU investment firm and a BIPRU firm under (b) or (c) must complete the report on the basis of its solo position.
Note 9	This will be applicable to firms that are members of a UK consolidation group on the reporting date.
Note 10	Only applicable to a firm whose ultimate parent is a mixed activity holding company.
Note 11	Only applicable to a firm that is a sole trader or a partnership, when the report must be submitted by each partner.
Note 12	This is only applicable to a firm that has both a core UK group and a non-core large exposures group.
Note 13	This does not apply to a firm subject to IPRU(INV) Chapter 13 which is not44 an exempt CAD firm.
Note 14	FSA034 must be completed by a firm not subject to the exemption in IPRU(INV) 5.2.3(2)R. FSA035 must be completed by a firm subject to the exemption in IPRU(INV) 5.2.3(2)R.
Note 15	FSA029, FSA030, FSA032 and FSA039 only apply to a firm subject to IPRU(INV) Chapter 13 which is an exempt CAD firm. Sections A, B, C, D1, D6and F RMAR only apply to a firm subject to IPRU(INV) Chapter 13 which is not an exempt CAD firm. Where a firm submits data items for both RAG 3 and RAG 9, the firm must complete both Sections D1 and D6 RMAR.
Note 16	[deleted]
Note 17	An exempt BIPRU commodity firm will, by virtue of the definition of BIPRU TP 15, be exempt from completing FSA003 (and thus FSA004, FSA005, FSA006 and FSA007) for the duration of the transitional provision. It is however required to submit all other data items applicable according to the firm's BIPRU classification including, for the avoidance of doubt, BIPRU TP 16.
Note 18	Except if the firm is an adviser, local or traded options market maker (as referred to in IPRU(INV) 3-60(4)R.
Note 19	In the case of an adviser, local or traded options market maker (as referred to in IPRU(INV) 3-60(4)R), it is only required from partnerships and bodies corporate, and then only if the report was audited as a result of a statutory provision other than under the Act.
Note 20	Only required in the case of an adviser, local or traded options market maker (as referred to in IPRU(INV) 3-60(4)R) that is a sole trader.
Note 21	[deleted]
Note 22	Only applicable to firms that have an IRB permission.
Note 23	Only applicable to firms that hold securitisation positions, or are the originator or sponsor of securitisations. of non-trading book exposures.
Note 24	Only applicable to firms granted a Part 30 exemption order and operating an arrangement to cover forward profits on the London Metals Exchange.
Note 25	Only applicable to a firm that has a solo consolidation waiver.
Note 26	A firm must complete this item separately on each of the following bases (if applicable). (1) It must complete it on a solo basis. Therefore even if it has a solo consolidation waiver it must complete the item on an unconsolidated basis by reference to the firm alone. (2) If it is a group liquidity reporting firm in a DLG by default and is a UK lead regulated firm, it must complete the item on the basis of that group. (3) If it is a group liquidity reporting firm in a UK DLG by modification, it must complete the item on the basis of that group. (4) If it is a group liquidity reporting firm in a non-UK DLG by modification, it must complete the item on the basis of that group.
Note 27	A firm must complete this item separately on each of the following bases that are applicable. (1) It must complete it on a solo basis unless it is a group liquidity reporting firm in a UK DLG by modification. Therefore even if it has a solo consolidation waiver it must complete the item on an unconsolidated basis by reference to the firm alone. (2) If it is a group liquidity reporting firm in a UK DLG by modification, it must complete the item on the basis of that group.
Note 28	If it is a non-ILAS BIPRU firm, it must complete it on a solo basis. Therefore even if it has a solo consolidation waiver it must complete the item on an unconsolidated basis by reference to the firm alone.
Note 29	(1) This item must be reported in the reporting currency. (2) If any data element is in a currency or currencies other than the reporting currency, all currencies (including the reporting currency) must be combined into a figure in the reporting currency. (3) In addition, all material currencies (which may include the reporting currency) must each be recorded separately (translated into the reporting currency). However if: (a) the reporting frequency is (whether under a rule or under a waiver) quarterly or less than quarterly; or (b) the only material currency is the reporting currency; (3) does not apply. (4) If there are more than three material currencies for this data item, (3) only applies to the three largest in amount. A firm must identify the largest in amount in accordance with the following procedure. (a) For each currency, take the largest of the asset or liability figure as referred to in the definition of material currency. (b) Take the three largest figures from the resulting list of amounts. (5) The date as at which the calculations for the purposes of the definition of material currency are carried out is the last day of the reporting period in question. (6) The reporting currency for this data item is whichever of the following currencies the firm chooses, namely USD (the United States Dollar), EUR (the euro), GBP (sterling), JPY (the Japanese Yen), CHF (the Swiss Franc), CAD (the Canadian Dollar) or SEK (the Swedish Krona).
Note 30	Note 29 applies, except that paragraphs (3), (4) and (5) do not apply, meaning that material currencies must not be recorded separately.
Note 31	Any changes to reporting requirements caused by a firm receiving an intra-group liquidity modification (or a variation to one) do not take effect until the first day of the next reporting period applicable under the changed reporting requirements for the data item in question if the firm receives that intra-group liquidity modification or variation part of the way through such a period. If the change is that the firm does not have to report a particular data item or does not have to report it at a particular reporting level, the firm must nevertheless report that item or at that reporting level for any reporting period that has already begun. This paragraph is subject to anything that the intra-group liquidity modification says to the contrary.15
Note 32	Only applicable to firms that hold securitisation positions in the trading book and/or are the originator or sponsor of securitisations held in the trading book.
Note 33	FSA047, FSA048, FSA050, FSA051, FSA052, FSA053 and FSA054 must be completed by an ILAS BIPRU firm. An ILAS BIPRU firm does not need to complete FSA055. A non-ILAS BIPRU firm must complete FSA055 and does not need to complete FSA047, FSA048, FSA050, FSA051, FSA052, FSA053 and FSA054.
Note 34	This data item must be reported only in the currencies named in FSA052, so that liabilities in GBP are reported in GBP in rows 1 to 4, those in USD are reported in USD in rows 5 to 8, and those in Euro are reported in Euro in rows 9 to 12. Liabilities in other currencies are not to be reported.
Note 35	Only applicable to firms that are collective portfolio management investment firms.
Note 36	Requirements under COREP and FINREP should be determined with reference to the EU CRR and applicable technical standards.

SYSC 14.1.29AG01/04/2013

10When determining the adequacy of its internal controls, a firm should consider both the potential risks that might hinder the achievement of the objectives listed in SYSC 14.1.28 G, and the extent to which it needs to control these risks. More specifically, this should normally include consideration of:(1) the appropriateness of its reporting and communication lines (see SYSC 3.2.2 G);(2) how the delegation or contracting of functions or activities to employees, appointed representatives

SUP 9.3.1G01/04/2013

Business and internal control risks vary from firm to firm, according to the nature and complexity of the business. The FCA's assessment of these risks is reflected in how its rules apply to different categories of firm as well as in the use of its other regulatory tools. One of the tools the FCA has available is to give a firm individual guidance on the application of the requirements or standards under the regulatory system in the firm's particular circumstances.

REC 2.1.4G01/04/2013

Location of recognition requirements and guidance

Recognition Requirements Regulations	Subject	Section in REC 2
Regulation 6	Method of satisfying recognition requirements	2.2
Part I of the Schedule	UK RIE recognition requirements
Paragraph 1	Financial resources	2.3
Paragraph 2	Suitability	2.4
Paragraph 3	Systems and controls	2.5
Paragraphs 4(1) and 4(2)(aa)2 2	General safeguards for investors	2.6
Paragraph 4(2)(a)	Access to facilities	2.7
Paragraph 4(2)(b)	Proper markets	2.12
Paragraph 4(2)(c)	Availability of relevant information	2.12
Paragraph 4(2)(d)	Settlement	2.8
Paragraph 4(2)(e)	Transaction recording	2.9
2Paragraph 4(2)(ea)	Conflicts	2.5
Paragraph 4(2)(f)	Financial crime and market abuse	2.10
Paragraph 4(2)(g)	Custody	2.11
Paragraph 4(3)	Definition of relevant information	2.12
2Paragraph 4A	Provision of pre-trade information about share trading	2.6
2Paragraph 4B	Provision of post-trade information about share trading	2.6
Paragraph 6	Promotion and maintenance of standards	2.13
Paragraph 7	Rules and consultation	2.14
2Paragraph 7A	Admission of financial instruments to trading	2.12
2Paragraph 7B and 7C	Access to facilities	2.7
2Paragraph 7D	Settlement	2.8
2Paragraph 7E	Suspension and removal of financial instruments from trading	2.6
Paragraph 8	Discipline	2.15
Paragraph 9	Complaints	2.16
2Paragraph 9A	Operation of a multilateral trading facility	2.16A
Part II of the Schedule	UK RIE default rules in respect of market contracts	2.174

Related provisions for CREDS 2.2.9

Search Term(s)

Filter by Topics

Filter by Modules

Filter by Documents

Filter by Keywords

Effective Period

Similar To

Frequently asked questions about allocation of functions in SYSC 2.1.3 R

Location of recognition requirements and guidance