Examples of good practice
|
Examples of poor practice
|
•
|
A bank can demonstrate senior management ownership and understanding of fraud affecting customers, including investment fraud.
|
•
|
A bank lacks a clear structure for the governance of investment fraud or for escalating issues relating to investment fraud. Respective responsibilities are not clear.
|
•
|
There is a clear organisational structure for addressing the risk to customers and the bank arising from fraud, including investment fraud. There is evidence of appropriate information moving across this governance structure that demonstrates its effectiveness in use.
|
•
|
A bank lacks a clear rationale for allocating resources to protecting customers from investment fraud.
|
•
|
A bank has recognised subject matter experts on investment fraud supporting or leading the investigation process.
|
•
|
A bank lacks documented policies and procedures relating to investment fraud.
|
•
|
A bank seeks to measure its performance in preventing detriment to customers.
|
•
|
There is a lack of communication between a bank’s AML and fraud teams on investment fraud.
|
•
|
When assessing the case for measures to prevent financial crime, a bank considers benefits to customers, as well as the financial impact on the bank.
|
|
|