1G
|
Application
|
1.
|
(1)
|
This
Annex is relevant to:
|
|
|
(a)
|
societies
(typically known as "study groups") seeking registration as credit
unions (see CRED 13
Ann 1A G 1(2)); and
|
|
|
(b)
|
credit
unions seeking to amend their membership qualifications.
|
|
(2)
|
When
the term "credit union" is in italics, its definition is in the Glossary to the FSAHandbook which reads: "a body corporate
registered under the Industrial and Provident Societies Act 1965 as a credit
union in accordance with the Credit Unions Act, which is an authorised person". When the term is
not in italics, it may also refer to a credit union that does not have permission
to take deposits, but is merely registered, or is a study group or other association
seeking to be registered as a credit union. The term is only intended to refer
to a credit union in Great Britain, not one in Northern Ireland.
|
Introduction
|
2.
|
(1)
|
This
Annex relates to section 1 of the Credit Unions Act 1979 (see CRED 13 Annex 1B). It explains how the FSA exercises its statutory function of satisfying
itself before registration that a common bond exists among the members of
a credit union.
|
|
(2)
|
These
are the key points covered by this Annex:
|
|
|
(a)
|
the
need for a common bond is fundamental to the regulatory regime for credit
unions;
|
|
|
(b)
|
an
"appropriate membership qualification" does not necessarily create
a common bond;
|
|
|
(c)
|
the FSA has adopted the following
policy for the geographical extent of terms limiting membership qualifications:
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
"locality" is comparable
in extent to a principal tier of local government (for example: a single city,
London borough or county); and
|
|
|
|
(ii)
|
"area" is comparable in extent
to a single administrative region (for example: Scotland, Wales, North-East
England or London);
|
|
|
(d)
|
a
membership qualification based on association between members may be combined
with another qualification set out in section 1(4) of the Credit Unions Act
1979 (for example, residing in or being employed in a particular locality
- see CRED 13 Annex 1B) but not with additional
qualifications created under that subsection;
|
|
|
(e)
|
common
bonds cannot be infinitely extended, so the FSA has adopted the policy of using the following
presumptions for or against the existence of a common bond for different numbers
of persons eligible for membership:
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
up to 100,000 - there is a presumption
for the common bond (if supported by a statutory declaration - see CRED 13 Ann 1A G 2(2)(g));
|
|
|
|
(ii)
|
from 100,000 to 1 million - there
is no presumption either way: the credit union has to make a case; and
|
|
|
|
(iii)
|
over 1 million - there is a presumption
against the common bond: the credit union will have to have particularly strong
arguments to succeed in making a case;
|
|
|
(f)
|
the
common bond is not a franchise, so:
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
when deciding whether to approve a common
bond, the FSA will
not take into account whether the proposed area overlaps the area of another
credit union; and
|
|
|
|
(ii)
|
it is not necessary for a credit union
to demonstrate an intention to service the whole of its common bond are
|
|
|
(g)
|
(i)
|
three members and the secretary of a
credit union may make a statutory declaration that as a result of the qualification
for admission to membership, a common bond exists between the members (but
the FSA may
require other evidence - see CRED 13
Ann1A 7(2)(b));
|
|
|
|
(ii)
|
there is a special form for this purpose;
|
|
|
|
(iii)
|
a statutory declaration is made under
the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835 and must be signed before
a solicitor or commissioner for oaths or notary public or justice of the peace;
|
|
|
|
(iv)
|
it is a criminal offence knowingly or
wilfully to make a false statutory declaration, and an offender may be imprisoned
or fined or both.
|
Statutory function
|
3.
|
A
credit union may be registered if the FSA is
satisfied (among other things) that admission is restricted to persons who
fulfil an "appropriate membership qualification", in consequence
of which a "common bond" exists among the members (sections 1(1)(a)
and 1(2)(b) of the Credit Unions Act 1979 (CRED 13 Annex 1B)).
|
Handbook material
|
4.
|
DEC
1.2.8 -DEC
1.2.10 G provide guidance on who within the FSA makes decisions under
section 1 of the Credit Unions Act 1979. It is possible for such decisions
to be taken to judicial review. CRED
13 (Registration and authorisation) is concerned with the registration and authorisation of
credit unions.
|
What is a common bond?
|
5.
|
(1)
|
The
Credit Unions Act 1979 provides for the registration of credit unions under
the Industrial and Provident Societies Act 1965 (the Act under which bona
fide co-operatives are registered).
|
|
(2)
|
Credit
unions are only allowed to have the objects set out in section 1(3) of the
Credit Unions Act 1979 (see CRED 13 Annex 1B). They are thus restricted to providing services
to their members, not to the public at large.
|
|
(3)
|
Membership
of a credit union must be restricted by an "appropriate membership qualification"
that creates a common bond (section 1(2)(b) of the Credit Unions Act 1979
- see CRED 13 Annex 1B and CRED 13 Annex 1C).
|
|
(4)
|
It
is apparent from the Parliamentary debates on the Credit Unions Act 1979 that
persons who had a common bond were envisaged as having some degree of shared
identity, a sense of belonging or a collective interest. The FSA considers that the
bond should be sufficient to encourage members to do some or all of the following:
|
|
|
(a)
|
play
an active role in the credit union (for example, by volunteering);
|
|
|
(b)
|
save
regularly; and
|
|
|
(c)
|
repay
loans promptly.
|
|
|
The
sense of obligation to save and repay among the members of credit unions would
be greater than among persons dealing with an ordinary commercial provider.
|
|
(5)
|
The
decision whether or not a common bond exists is made under the Credit Unions
Act 1979, so the basis for the FSA's decision
will be confined to criteria under that Act, and prudential issues will not
be directly involved. However, in discharging its responsibilities under the Act, the FSA will need to satisfy itself that the
credit union will meet or continue to meet the threshold conditions and not put its members'
funds at risk. These issues will be considered in a risk-based manner when
the FSA decides
whether or not to give a credit union permission to accept deposits. Section
1 of the Credit Unions Act 1979 as amended (see CRED 13 Annex 1B) provides that a credit union may not be
registered unless it has applied to the FSA for
such permission, and the FSA shall
not register a credit union unless it proposes to give the credit union permission.
The FSA may
give the credit union an opportunity of withdrawing an application for registration
if it considers that it will not be able to grant authorisation. Prudential
issues will also be considered separately when a credit union seeks to amend
its membership qualification.
|
|
(6)
|
It
is important that a credit union should not admit to membership any person
who does not share the common bond; that is any person who is ineligible under
the credit union's membership qualification. CRED 13 Annex 2 G provides further guidance about the consequences
of admitting ineligible persons.
|
What is an "appropriate membership qualification"?
|
6.
|
(1)
|
"Appropriate
membership qualifications" are such qualifications as "residing
in a particular locality", "being employed by a particular employer"
and "being a member of a bona fide organisation". Some of the
qualifications were included when the Credit Unions Act 1979 was passed; others
have been added to that Act by Deregulation and other Orders; and others have
been approved by the FSA,
or its predecessor, the Registry of Friendly Societies. A full list of "appropriate
membership qualifications" is given in CRED 13 Annex 1B (Section 1 of the Credit Unions Act 1979, as amended)
and CRED 13 Annex 1C (Qualifications approved
by the FSA (and
the Registry of Friendly Societies)). The FSA has power to approve further qualifications.
|
|
(2)
|
The
membership of a credit union is made up of the following types of member:
|
|
|
(a)
|
directly
qualifying member - who fulfils the "appropriate membership qualification";
|
|
|
(b)
|
indirectly
qualifying member ("family member") - who lives in the same household
as, and is a relative of, a directly qualifying member; and
|
|
|
(c)
|
non-qualifying
member - who joined the credit union as a directly or indirectly qualifying
member, but has ceased to be so.
|
|
|
Further
guidance on eligibility for membership of a credit union is given in CRED 13 Annex 2 G.
|
|
(3)
|
The
two concepts of the "appropriate membership qualification" and
the "common bond" are often treated in the credit union sector
as though they were interchangeable, but this is not the case. The "appropriate
membership qualification" exists as the basis for creating the common
bond: thus, the "appropriate membership qualification" may be
viewed as the cause and the "common bond" the effect. But the
fact that there is an "appropriate membership qualification" does not necessarily
mean that there will be a "common bond".
|
|
(4)
|
For
registration to be possible, both the "appropriate membership qualification"
and the "common bond" have to be in place. On examining the "appropriate
membership qualification", the FSA could
in theory infer from it the existence of a "common bond" (section
1(5)(b) of the Credit Unions Act 1979 - see CRED 13 Annex 1B) without a statutory declaration or further
evidence. However, the FSA is
unlikely to be able to make this inference for any but the smallest of population
pools - see CRED 13
Ann 1A 7(2).
|
|
(5)
|
Since
the Regulatory Reform (Credit Unions) Order 2003, it is possible for a credit
union to adopt a membership qualification combining association and one of
the other qualifications set out in section 1(4)(a), (b), (c), (d) or (f)
of the Credit Unions Act 1979, as amended (without the need for the FSA to approve an additional
qualification for each combination, under the power in the tailpiece to that
subsection - see CRED 13 Annex 1B). For example, a credit union may now adopt a membership
qualification under which some members reside in the locality (but do not
belong to a bona fide organisation there) and other members belong to a bona
fide organisation in the locality (but do not reside there). However, a credit
union cannot combine association and one of the qualifications approved by
the FSA or
Registry of Friendly Societies (see CRED 13 Annex 1C and CRED 13
Ann 1A G 10(2)); nor may the qualifications in section 1(4)(a), (b), (c),
(d) or (f) of the Credit Unions Act 1979, as amended, be combined with each
other (see CRED 13 Annex 1B).
|
|
(6)
|
Having
chosen an "appropriate membership qualification" from the list,
it has always been possible for a credit union to impose within its registered
rules an additional requirement upon members. This is the effect of the words
in section 1(2)(b) of the Credit Unions Act 1979 see CRED 13 Annex 1B: "whether or not any other qualifications
are also required by the rules". Thus it has always been possible to
adopt a requirement that each member of the credit union must both reside
and belong to a bona fide organisation in the locality. Under such a qualification,
neither a person who merely resides (but does not belong to the organisation),
nor one who merely belongs to the organisation (but does not reside) may join
the credit union.
|
|
(7)
|
CRED 13 Annex 1C
lists the qualifications
approved by the FSA (or
its predecessor, the Registry of Friendly Societies). The FSA has power, as previously mentioned, to
approve further qualifications.
|
What has the FSA to decide?
|
7.
|
(1)
|
In
relation to membership, the FSA has
to be satisfied on two counts:
|
|
|
(a)
|
there
is an "appropriate membership qualification" ; and
|
|
|
(b)
|
in
consequence of the "appropriate membership qualification", a common
bond exists.
|
|
|
It
is a two-stage process: the first stage is factual (a question of technical
validity); the second is judgemental (and potentially subjective).
|
|
(2)
|
If
it considers it proper in the circumstances of the case, the FSA may:
|
|
|
(a)
|
infer
the existence of a common bond from the appropriate membership qualification
(but see CRED 13
Ann 1A G 6(4)); or
|
|
|
(b)
|
rely
on a statutory declaration (by 3 members and the secretary of the credit union
or prospective credit union - see CRED 13
Ann 1A 2(2)(g)) that a common bond exists (section 1(5) of the Credit Unions
Act 1979 - see CRED 13 Annex 1B). Even where a statutory declaration is given, the FSA may require other
evidence to support the credit union's (or prospective credit union's)
contention that there is a common bond.
|
Meaning of "locality " in "appropriate membership
qualifications " based on residence
|
8.
|
(1)
|
Although
several of the "appropriate membership qualifications" (see CRED 13 Annex 1B - CRED 13 Annex 1C) use the term "locality", it
is not defined by the Credit Unions Act 1979. Historically, the Registry of
Friendly Societies took a fairly restrictive view of its meaning, but the FSA is taking a broader
one, drawing on case law and other statutory uses of that term.
|
|
(2)
|
The FSA's working definition
is that a "locality" is a natural geographical or administrative
unit, comparable in size (but not limited to) the principal tier of local
government in Great Britain, that is unitary authorities or county councils.
The justification for this is that the common provision of "local"
public services is currently made at this level.
|
|
(3)
|
So
the FSA will
generally accept that "locality" extends up to the area covered
by such local authorities, and so may cover such areas as single cities, London
boroughs or counties. If larger areas were proposed, the onus would lie with
credit unions to demonstrate that they still constituted a "locality".
Even if a geographical or administrative area satisfies the criteria for being
a "locality", that does not mean that there will be a common bond
(see CRED 13
Ann 1A G 2(2)(b) and 11(1)-(5)).
|
Meaning of "area " in "appropriate membership
qualifications " based on employment
|
9.
|
The
"appropriate membership qualification" based on employment in CRED 13 Annex 1C uses the term "area",
but this is not defined in the Credit Unions Act 1979. The FSA accepts that the term "area"
is potentially much larger in scope than "locality", and that
it could extend up to the size of a single standard administrative region
within Great Britain. So, for example, Scotland, Wales, the North-East of
England or Greater London could be regarded as "areas" for the
purpose of this "appropriate membership qualification". To be
acceptable, it is not necessary for the boundary proposed by a credit union
to coincide with an actual standard administrative region.
|
Regulatory Reform (Credit Unions) Order 2003 and associational
"appropriate membership qualification"
|
10.
|
(1)
|
The
"appropriate membership qualification" in section 1(4)(e) of the
Credit Unions Act 1979 is that of "being a member of a bona fide organisation
or being otherwise associated with other members of the society for a purpose
other than that of forming a society to be registered as a credit union".
So the members must be associated through something other than the credit
union. The stronger the character of the association between the individuals,
the more likely it is to form the basis for the existence of a common bond.
|
|
(2)
|
As
a result of the Regulatory Reform (Credit Unions) Order 2003, it is now possible
for a credit union to adopt a membership qualification combining association
and one of the other qualifications set out in section 1(4)(a), (b), (c),
(d) or (f) of the Credit Unions Act 1979, as amended (without the need for
the FSA to
approve an additional qualification for each combination, under the power
in the tailpiece to that subsection - see CRED 13 Annex 1B and CRED 13
Ann 1A G 6(5)). However, it is not possible for a credit union to combine
association and one of those qualifications specifically approved by the FSA or its predecessor,
the Registry of Friendly Societies - see CRED 13 Annex 1C and CRED 13
Ann 1A G 6(5), nor may the qualifications in section 1(4)(a), (b), (c), (d)
or (f) of the Credit Unions Act 1979, as amended, be combined with each other.
This means that a single credit union may be properly formed for persons who:
|
|
|
(a)
|
live
or work in a locality; or
|
|
|
(b)
|
associate
with the residents and workers (through, for example, attending a religious
centre in the locality).
|
|
(3)
|
However,
it is still necessary to establish that the qualifications establish a common
bond: this may be difficult if there is no shared identity between the members
qualifying under the different qualifications (even where the population pool
is below 100,000 - CRED 13
Ann 1A G 11(3)).
|
Overall size of population pool for "appropriate membership
qualifications "
|
11.
|
(1)
|
It
is in the nature of the common bond that the concept cannot be infinitely
expanded: the larger the eligible population pool covered by an "appropriate
membership qualification", the weaker or less plausible will be the
existence of a common bond.
|
|
(2)
|
It
is not practical to expect credit unions to operate on the basis that members
will be fully acquainted with each other, but there has to be some mutual
identification, and some point at which this ceases to have a significant
effect.
|
|
(3)
|
The
Registry of Friendly Societies (a predecessor of the FSA) adopted 100,000 as an indicative maximum
for the size of the residential population in a common bond area. The FSA has further developed
that thinking through its decisions in subsequent cases. For full transparency,
the indicative bands currently used by the FSA are set out below:
|
|
|
(a)
|
where
an "appropriate membership qualification" covers a pool of up
to 100,000 people eligible to be members:
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
there is a presumption in favour of the
existence of a common bond; and
|
|
|
|
(ii)
|
the FSA will
(provided the "appropriate membership qualification" is technically
valid and there are no unusual features) generally accept a simple explanation
of the nature of the common bond, together with a statutory declaration (but
see CRED 13
Ann 1A G 10(3)).
|
|
|
(b)
|
where
an "appropriate membership qualification" covers a pool of between
100,000 and 1 million eligible people:
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
there is no presumption in favour of
the existence of a common bond; and
|
|
|
|
(ii)
|
the FSA expects
the credit union to make a positive, convincing case, marshalling all the
information relevant to establishing that a common bond exists among the members.
|
|
|
(c)
|
where
an "appropriate membership qualification" covers a pool of more
than 1 million eligible people:
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
there is a presumption that the common
bond is so dilute as to be meaningless; but
|
|
|
|
(ii)
|
it is open to a credit union to make
a submission to convince the FSA that
a common bond exists among the members: but its arguments would have to be
particularly strong for it to succeed in making a case.
|
|
(4)
|
The FSA's decision whether
or not to accept the existence of a common bond (for a new or prospective
credit union) is made on an individual basis. So decisions (whether made by
the FSA or
its predecessor, the Registry of Friendly Societies) create no binding precedent
that a population pool of a given size is acceptable for a particular "appropriate
membership qualification".
|
|
(5)
|
Given
the range of "appropriate membership qualification" and the different
populations covered, it is not possible to be prescriptive about the information
necessary to show that a common bond is real. In general, it has been the
experience of the Registry of Friendly Societies and the FSA that it is fairly straightforward to
make a plausible case for the existence of a common bond where the "appropriate
membership qualification" is based on employment by a single employer.
For residential qualifications, applicants should draw on their local knowledge
to identify those elements, geographical and social that create a sense of
cohesion. For a qualification based on living or working in a particular locality,
the applicants might wish to identify the ways in which workers from outside
the area become involved in the activities of the residential community.
|
|
(6)
|
The
size thresholds set out above apply to the number of persons eligible for
membership under any "appropriate membership qualification", not
just ones based on residence.
|
Overlapping common bond areas
|
12.
|
A
common bond area cannot be regarded legally as a franchise, giving exclusive
rights of access to a particular area or pool of potential members. The FSA recognises the value
of consolidation in providing stronger entities, but there is no justification
in current legislation for refusing the registration of a new credit union
in an area already served by existing credit unions, nor even for consulting
them: the FSA's decision
on registration is based only on the criteria in the Credit Unions Act 1979
(see CRED 13
Ann 1A G 5(5). In the absence of express statutory support, it would be wrong
for the FSA to
act in a manner that could be construed as anti-competitive. So the FSA will not refuse registration
on the grounds of overlap, nor will it undertake to consult credit unions
whose common bond area may be overlapped by a later registration.
|
Servicing whole of area
|
13.
|
Since
the common bond is not a franchise, the FSA will
not expect a credit union to service fully the whole of its area or population
pool. But where the "appropriate membership qualification" covers
a large population pool, the inference is that the bond is likely to be weaker,
and there will need to be more justification. An intention to service only
part of the area does not help to establish whether or not the "appropriate
membership qualification" establishes a common bond for the area as
a whole.
|
Mergers
|
14.
|
(1)
|
The
Credit Unions Act 1979 allows credit unions to merge, either by amalgamation
(where a new credit union is created and the constituents cease to exist)
or by transfer of engagements (where the credit union transferring its engagements
ceases to exist, but the enlarged credit union accepting the engagements continues).
|
|
(2)
|
For
either of these procedures to be practicable in individual cases:
|
|
|
(a)
|
the
merged credit union will need to have an "appropriate membership qualification"
that creates a "common bond"; and
|
|
|
(b)
|
members
of the constituent credit unions will need to be eligible for membership of
the merged credit union.
|
|
(3)
|
So
in individual cases:
|
|
|
(a)
|
it
might not be possible for the merged credit union to adopt an "appropriate
membership qualification" (for example, the new catchment area required
for the merger of two residential credit unions might not qualify under the
definition of "locality" - see CRED 13 Ann 1A G 8(1)-(3));
|
|
|
(b)
|
even
though each credit union seeking to merge has a "common bond"
among its own members, this does not necessarily mean that there would be
a common bond among all the members of the merged credit union (for example,
too large a population pool might be produced by the merger - see CRED 13 Ann 1A G 11(1)).
|
What information does a credit union need to provide in support
of a common bond application?
|
15.
|
Table
|
Population pool
|
Information needed
|
Up
to 100,000
|
Statutory declaration
Simple explanation of common bond (subject
to CRED 13
Ann 1A G 10(3))
|
100,000
to 1 million
|
Convincing case that common bond exists
|
Over
1 million
|
Evidence to rebut presumption against
existence of common bond (special factors generating particular interaction
in this population pool, despite its large size and the dilution normally
expected in such circumstances)
|