[Note: As a result of applications made to the Upper Tribunal challenging these rules, the Tribunal has ordered that this provision is partially or wholly suspended until further order of the Tribunal or until the final determination of those applications. See this page for further information about which provisions remain in force and which ones are suspended.]
- (1) Where a lender has determined that, in relation to a scheme case, there was an unfair relationship under CONRED 6.3 and the consumer has suffered loss or damage as a result, the lender must calculate the amount of redress payable in accordance with CONRED 6.4.3R to CONRED 6.4.35R.
- (2) Where there was a failure to provide adequate disclosure of a high commission arrangement together with a tied arrangement or a discretionary commission arrangement or both, the lender must determine whether there was a very high commission arrangement, and, if so, calculate redress in accordance with the commission repayment remedy (CONRED 6.4.4R).
- (3) In all other cases, except where CONRED 6.4.6R applies, the lender must calculate redress in accordance with the hybrid remedy CONRED 6.4.15R to 6.4.16R and calculate and, where required, apply the caps in CONRED 6.4.19R to 6.4.21R.
- (4) CONRED 6.4.6R applies to a scheme case under the hybrid remedy, where the consumer paid a minimal cost of credit, offered to 5% of the market at the time (excluding 0% APR agreements). In such cases, no redress is payable.

