Content Options:

Content Options

View Options:


You are viewing the version of the document as on 2022-03-04.

MIFIDPRU 4.7 K-AUM requirement

MIFIDPRU 4.7.1R
MIFIDPRU 4.7.2R

1When measuring its AUM, a MIFIDPRU investment firm must include any amounts that relate to the MiFID business of the firm that is carried on by any tied agents acting on its behalf.

MIFIDPRU 4.7.3G

1The definition of AUM does not include any amounts arising from the firm’s provision of the ancillary service in paragraph 3 of Part 3A of Schedule 2 to the Regulated Activities Order (i.e. providing advice to undertakings on capital structure, industrial strategy and related matters and advice and services relating to mergers and the purchase of undertakings).

MIFIDPRU 4.7.4R

1A firm must calculate its K-AUM requirement on the first business day of each month.

MIFIDPRU 4.7.5R
  1. (1)

    1A firm must calculate the amount of its average AUM by:

    1. (a)

      taking the total AUM as measured on the last business day of each of the previous 15 months;

    2. (b)

      excluding the 3 most recent monthly values; and

    3. (c)

      calculating the arithmetic mean of the remaining 12 monthly values.

  2. (2)

    When measuring the value of its AUM on the last business day of each month, a firm must convert any amounts in foreign currencies on that date into the firm’s functional currency.

  3. (3)

    For the purposes of the currency conversion in (2), a firm must:

    1. (a)

      determine the conversion rate by reference to an appropriate market rate; and

    2. (b)

      record the rate used.

MIFIDPRU 4.7.6G
  1. (1)

    1The effect of MIFIDPRU 4.7.5R(2) is that when measuring the value of AUM at the end of each month, a firm must apply the relevant conversion rate on that date to the AUM attributable to that month. The AUM for each relevant preceding month should continue to be measured by reference to the conversion rate that was applicable at the end of that particular preceding month.

  2. (2)

    For purposes of MIFIDPRU 4.7.5R(3), where a firm is carrying out a conversion that involves sterling, the FCA considers that an example of an appropriate market rate is the relevant daily spot exchange rate against sterling published by the Bank of England.

MIFIDPRU 4.7.7R
  1. (1)

    1When measuring the amount of its AUM, a firm must:

    1. (a)

      where available, use the market value of the relevant assets;

    2. (b)

      where a market value is not available for an asset, use an alternative measure of fair value, which may include an estimated value calculated on a best efforts basis;

    3. (c)

      exclude any amounts that are included in the firm’s calculation of its CMH.

  2. (2)

    When measuring the amount of its AUM, a firm may offset any negative values or liabilities attributable to positions within the relevant portfolios, so that AUM is equal to the net total value of the relevant assets.

MIFIDPRU 4.7.8R

1Where the firm has delegated the management of assets to another entity, the firm must include the value of those assets in its measurement of AUM.

MIFIDPRU 4.7.9R
  1. (1)

    1Subject to (2), where a financial entity has formally delegated the management of assets to the firm, the firm may exclude the value of those assets from its measurement of AUM.

  2. (2)

    The exclusion in (1) does not apply if the financial entity has excluded the relevant assets from the financial entity’s calculation of its own capital requirements because the financial entity is also acting as a delegated manager.

  3. (3)

    For the purposes of (1), formal delegation requires a legally binding agreement between the financial entity and the firm that sets out the rights and obligations of each party in relation to the delegation of the relevant portfolio management activities.

MIFIDPRU 4.7.10G
  1. (1)

    1MIFIDPRU 4.7.8R and MIFIDPRU 4.7.9R apply where one entity delegates management of assets to another entity. For these purposes, delegation involves a delegating entity (“A”) assuming a duty to the relevant client to manage the assets, and A then delegating the performance of that duty (in whole or in part) to another entity (“B”).

  2. (2)

    The following are not delegation for the purposes of MIFIDPRU 4.7.8R or MIFIDPRU 4.7.9R:

    1. (a)

      where A only arranges for B to provide a service directly to a client, so that B owes a duty directly to the client to manage the assets and A does not; or

    2. (b)

      where A advises a client to use B’s management services for the client’s assets, but A does not assume any responsibility to the client for managing the assets.

  3. (3)

    MIFIDPRU 4.7.8R states that a MIFIDPRU investment firm cannot reduce its AUM by delegating management of assets to another entity. This is because the firm will normally continue to owe a duty directly to the client, even if performance of that duty has been delegated (wholly or partly) to another entity.

  4. (4)

    However, MIFIDPRU 4.7.9R(1) permits a firm to which the management of assets has been formally delegated to exclude the value of the assets when measuring its AUM if the delegating entity is a financial entity. However, if the delegation does not meet the requirements to be a formal delegation, the firm may not exclude the relevant assets from its measurement of AUM. The definition of a financial entity covers:

    1. (a)

      entities that are subject to an AUM-based capital requirement that is similar to the K-AUM requirement;

    2. (b)

      an insurance undertaking that forms part of the same financial conglomerate as the firm if the FCA is the coordinator for that financial conglomerate; and

    3. (c)

      an undertaking that is part of the same investment firm group as the firm, provided that the investment firm group is subject to prudential consolidation under MIFIDPRU 2.5 and both entities are included within the resulting consolidated situation of the UK parent entity of that investment firm group.

  5. (5)

    MIFIDPRU 4.7.9R(1) is a limited exclusion that applies where assets under management have been delegated to the firm by a financial entity. This reflects the fact that the financial entity will either have a minimum AUM-based capital requirement or the FCA will have additional supervisory powers to take into account the position of the financial entity because it forms part of the same financial conglomerate or prudential consolidation group as the firm. However, even where a financial entity is included within the same financial conglomerate or investment firm group to which MIFIDPRU 2.5 applies, MIFIDPRU 4.7.9R(1) may be disapplied by MIFIDPRU 4.7.9R(2) for sub-delegation arrangements. This is because extended chains of delegation may involve additional operational risks.

  6. (6)

    MIFIDPRU 4.7.9R(2) applies if a firm is managing a portfolio under sub-delegation arrangements. Its effect is illustrated by the following example: Firm A (a third country entity that is a financial entity) formally delegates the management of a portfolio of assets to Firm B (a MIFIDPRU investment firm). Firm B formally sub-delegates the management of part of the portfolio to Firm C (another MIFIDPRU investment firm). Firm B may apply the exclusion in MIFIDPRU 4.7.9R(1), on the basis that Firm A is a financial entity. However, if Firm B applies the MIFIDPRU 4.7.9R(1) exclusion, Firm C cannot also exclude the value of the sub-delegated assets from Firm C’s measurement of AUM. This is because MIFIDPRU 4.7.9R(2) disapplies the MIFIDPRU 4.7.9R(1) exclusion if the delegating entity has already applied a similar exclusion in relation to the same portfolio.

  7. (7)

    MIFIDPRU 4.7.9R(2) also applies if the delegating entity is a financial entity in a third country and is applying an equivalent exclusion. For example, Firm D (an entity in a third country) delegates the management of a portfolio to Firm E (a financial entity in a third country). Firm E sub-delegates the management of part of that portfolio to Firm F (a MIFIDPRU investment firm). The third country rules to which Firm E is subject permit Firm E to exclude the value of the assets delegated by Firm D from Firm E’s AUM-based capital requirement. If Firm E is relying on that exclusion, Firm F cannot rely on the exclusion in MIFIDPRU 4.7.9R(1).

MIFIDPRU 4.7.11G

1Where a financial entity (“A”) provides investment advice of an ongoing nature to a MIFIDPRU investment firm (“B”) and B undertakes discretionary portfolio management, the arrangement does not fall within MIFIDPRU 4.7.9R. This is because the arrangement is not a formal delegation of the management of assets by A to B, but involves 2 distinct activities: ongoing investment advice provided by A and discretionary portfolio management undertaken by B. In this situation, if A is a MIFIDPRU investment firm, it must include any assets in relation to which it is providing the advice in its measurement of AUM. Where B undertakes discretionary portfolio management in relation to the same assets, B must also include those assets in its own measurement of AUM.

MIFIDPRU 4.7.12R
  1. (1)

    1This rule applies where a firm has been managing assets for its clients under discretionary portfolio management or non-discretionary arrangements constituting investment advice of an ongoing nature for less than 15 months.

  2. (2)

    For the purposes of calculating average AUM under MIFIDPRU 4.7.5R, a firm must use the modified calculation in MIFIDPRU TP 4.11R(1) with the following adjustments:

    1. (a)

      in MIFIDPRU TP 4.11R(1)(b), n is the relevant number of months for which the firm has been managing assets for its clients under discretionary portfolio management or non-discretionary arrangements constituting investment advice of an ongoing nature (with the month during which the firm begins that activity counted as month zero); and

    2. (b)

      during month zero of the calculation, the firm must:

      1. (i)

        use a best efforts estimate of expected AUM for that month based on the firm’s projections when beginning the new activity; and

      2. (ii)

        use the estimate in (i) as its average AUM;

    3. (c)

      during month 1 of the calculation and each month thereafter, the firm must apply the approach in (a) using observed historical data from the preceding months; and

    4. (d)

      the modified calculation ceases to apply on the date that falls 15 months after the date on which the firm began managing assets under (1).

MIFIDPRU 4.7.13G

1MIFIDPRU 4.10.26G to MIFIDPRU 4.10.32G and MIFIDPRU 4 Annex 12G contain additional guidance on the interaction between the measurement of a firm’s AUM and the measurement of a firm’s COH.

Investment advice of an ongoing nature

MIFIDPRU 4.7.14G
  1. (1)

    1The definition of investment advice of an ongoing nature includes:

    1. (a)

      the recurring provision of investment advice; or

    2. (b)

      investment advice given in the context of the continuous or periodic assessment and monitoring, or review of a client portfolio of financial instruments, including of the investments undertaken by the client on the basis of a contractual arrangement.

  2. (2)

    In either case, the firm must provide investment advice as part of the relevant arrangement. This means that the firm must provide a personal recommendation to the client. Therefore, where a firm merely provides generic advice to a client that does not result in a personal recommendation, the firm does not need to include the value of any assets that are the subject of the generic advice in its measurement of AUM. Firms should refer to the guidance in PERG 13.3 for further information on investment advice, personal recommendations and generic advice.

  3. (3)

    For example, a firm may undertake a periodic review of a client’s portfolio to assess whether the balance between investments in equities and fixed income products is appropriate. If the firm advises the client only in general terms to invest a higher proportion of the portfolio in equities and a lower proportion in bonds, this would not normally constitute investment advice, unless the firm also gave advice on investing in specific equities or bonds. Provided that the firm does not give advice relating to specific investments (i.e. a personal recommendation), it therefore would not need to include the value of the portfolio when measuring its AUM.

MIFIDPRU 4.7.15G
  1. (1)

    1When giving investment advice of an ongoing nature, the assets that the firm must include within its measurement of AUM will depend on the scope of the firm’s obligation to provide investment advice.

  2. (2)

    In some circumstances, a firm may have assumed a duty to provide investment advice in relation to the client’s entire portfolio. For example, a financial adviser may agree to carry out periodic reviews of a client’s entire portfolio and to make recommendations to the client about the specific financial instruments in which the client should invest. In that case, the firm must include the entire value of the client’s portfolio (to the extent that the portfolio consists of financial instruments) in the firm’s measurement of AUM. This is because the firm has assumed a duty to provide investment advice of an ongoing nature in relation to the entire portfolio.

  3. (3)

    In other situations, the scope of the firm’s duty to provide investment advice may be more limited. For example, a firm may agree with a client that the firm will provide investment advice only on a particular subset of assets or only when specifically requested by the client. In that case, the firm’s duty to provide investment advice of an ongoing nature is limited to the relevant subset of assets, or the specific financial instruments in respect of which the client requests advice. Therefore, the firm would be required to include only the value of those particular assets or financial instruments when measuring its AUM.

  4. (4)

    A firm may have assumed different duties in respect of different parts of a client’s portfolio. For example, a firm may have agreed to carry out a general review of whether the client’s portfolio is appropriately balanced in a manner that would constitute only generic advice, rather than a personal recommendation. However, the firm may also be under a duty to provide investment advice on the equities held within the portfolio. In that case, the general review would not constitute investment advice (as it is only generic advice) and therefore the firm does not need to include the entire value of the client’s portfolio in the firm’s measurement of AUM. However, as the firm does have an ongoing duty to provide investment advice in relation to the equities held in the portfolio, the firm must include the value of those assets within its measurement of AUM.

  5. (5)

    Where a firm provides recurring investment advice to a client without assuming a continuing duty, the firm is only required to include the value of the particular financial instruments in respect of which it provides investment advice in the firm’s measurement of its AUM.

MIFIDPRU 4.7.16G
  1. (1)

    1Investment advice of an ongoing nature includes arrangements involving periodic or continuous investment advice and arrangements involving recurring investment advice.

  2. (2)

    Periodic or continuous investment advice is most likely to arise where a firm agrees with a client that the firm will keep the client’s portfolio under review or will provide advice to the client at various points during a specified period. For example, a firm may agree to manage a client’s portfolio on a non-discretionary basis so that the firm has an ongoing duty to make personal recommendations to the client, but the client decides whether to proceed with each transaction. Alternatively, the firm may agree with the client to review the client’s portfolio on, for example, a quarterly basis and to provide the client with personal recommendations following each review.

  3. (3)

    Recurring investment advice does not require the firm to have assumed an ongoing or periodic duty to provide investment advice to the client. Instead, the firm provides investment advice to the same client repeatedly, even though there is no agreement with the client to establish a formal ongoing relationship. When considering whether investment advice is recurring for these purposes, a firm should assess whether, in substance, the type and pattern of advice that it provides is similar to periodic or continuous advice. This means that a firm cannot prevent what are, in substance, ongoing advisory arrangements for a client from constituting investment advice of an ongoing nature by artificially separating them into multiple individual agreements to provide advice to that client. If requested by the FCA, a firm should be able to justify why the firm has concluded that a particular set of advisory arrangements with a client does not constitute investment advice of an ongoing nature.

  4. (4)

    Investment advice of an ongoing nature does not include genuinely isolated or sporadic instances of investment advice provided to the same client that do not, in substance, amount to ongoing arrangements. However, a firm should assess the potential harms arising from any investment advice that is not investment advice of an ongoing nature as part of its ICARA process.

MIFIDPRU 4.7.17G
  1. (1)

    1Where a firm provides investment advice in the context of the continuous or periodic assessment and monitoring or review of a client portfolio of financial instruments, the value of AUM that the firm includes in respect of that portfolio should be determined by the scope of the firm’s duty to the client.

  2. (2)

    If the firm is under a duty to review the client’s entire portfolio and provide investment advice as a result, the value of all financial instruments in the portfolio should be included in AUM. If the firm’s duty is limited to specific financial instruments, only those financial instruments need to be included in AUM.

MIFIDPRU 4.7.18R

1For the purposes of the calculation of average AUM in MIFIDPRU 4.7.5R:

  1. (1)

    if the firm is under a duty to undertake a continuous assessment of the portfolio (or a subset of the portfolio), the firm must measure the value of AUM of the portfolio (or the relevant subset of it) on the last business day of each month during which that duty applies; and

  2. (2)

    if the firm is under a duty to undertake periodic assessments of the portfolio (or a subset of the portfolio), the firm must use the value of the portfolio (or the relevant subset of it) at the time of the last review as the relevant value of AUM for each month until the next periodic review occurs (or the firm’s duty ends, if earlier).

MIFIDPRU 4.7.19G

1The requirement in MIFIDPRU 4.7.18R(2) is illustrated by the following example:

  1. (1)

    On 1 March, the firm reviews the client’s entire portfolio of financial instruments and provides investment advice to the client. The value of the client’s portfolio is 100 on that date. The firm is required to carry out its next review of the client’s portfolio on 1 June. The firm would include a value of 100 in its AUM for each of March, April and May.

  2. (2)

    On 1 June, the firm reviews the client’s entire portfolio again and provides further investment advice to the client. The value of the client’s portfolio on that date is 110. The firm would include a value of 110 in its AUM for June and each subsequent month until the time of the next review, or until the firm’s duty to carry out a review of the client’s portfolio ends (if earlier).

MIFIDPRU 4.7.20G
  1. (1)

    1Where a firm provides recurring investment advice to a client, the value of AUM that the firm must include in respect of that client should be measured by the value of the financial instruments that are the subject of the relevant investment advice.

  2. (2)

    Under MIFIDPRU 4.7.5R, to calculate its average AUM, a firm must take the 15 most recent monthly values of AUM and exclude the most recent 3 months before calculating the arithmetic mean of the remaining values. MIFIDPRU 4.7.21R explains how a firm should measure the monthly value of AUM when it is providing recurring investment advice to a client.

MIFIDPRU 4.7.21R
  1. (1)

    1Subject to (2), for the purposes of the calculation of average AUM under MIFIDPRU 4.7.5R, the value of AUM for recurring investment advice given in relation to a client in any given month is the sum of:

    1. (a)

      the AUM arising from the recurring investment advice given by the firm to that client during that month; and

    2. (b)

      the AUM arising from the recurring investment advice given by the firm to that client during the immediately preceding 11 months.

  2. (2)

    When measuring AUM under (1), a firm may adjust the AUM figure to reflect the fact that the firm has previously given investment advice in relation to the same assets during the preceding 11 months.

MIFIDPRU 4.7.22G
  1. (1)

    1The effect of MIFIDPRU 4.7.21R is illustrated by the following example.

  2. (2)

    A firm provides recurring investment advice to a client. The dates on which the firm provides advice and the value of the financial instruments that are the subject of the advice are set out in the table below. In October 2022, the firm provides advice in relation to the same assets worth 25 on which the firm advised in March 2022, plus additional assets worth 45.

    Date of advice

    Value of financial instruments

    January 2022

    50

    February 2022

    No advice given

    March 2022

    25

    April 2022

    100

    May 2022

    No advice given

    June 2022

    50

    July 2022

    No advice given

    August 2022

    No advice given

    September 2022

    80

    October 2022

    70 (consisting of the same assets in March 2022 worth 25 and 45 of new assets)

    November 2022

    No advice given

    December 2022

    10

    January 2023

    No advice given

    February 2023

    No advice given

    March 2023

    30

  3. (3)

    MIFIDPRU 4.7.21R means that AUM from recurring investment advice is cumulative across a rolling 12-month period. The following table shows how the firm in (2) would calculate the AUM attributable to the provision of recurring investment advice to the client.

    Date of advice

    Value of AUM

    January 2022

    50

    February 2022

    50

    March 2022

    75

    (i.e. 50 + 25)

    April 2022

    175

    (i.e. 50 + 25 + 100)

    May 2022

    175

    June 2022

    225

    (i.e. 50 + 25 + 100 + 50)

    July 2022

    225

    August 2022

    225

    September 2022

    305

    (i.e. 50 + 25 + 100 + 50 + 80)

    October 2022

    350

    (i.e. 50 + 25 + 100 + 50 +80 + 70 = 375

    375 – 25 (adjustment for the same assets in March 2022) = 350)

    November 2022

    350

    December 2022

    360

    (i.e. 50 + 25 + 100 + 50 + 80 + 70 + 10 = 385

    385 – 25 (adjustment for the same assets in March 2022) = 360)

    January 2023

    310

    (i.e. 25 + 100 + 50 + 80 + 70 + 10 = 335

    335 – 25 (adjustment for the same assets in March 2022) = 310)

    February 2023

    310

    March 2023

    340

    (i.e. 100 + 50 + 80 + 70 + 10 + 30)

  4. (4)

    At the end of March 2023, the firm would therefore calculate average AUM and the K-AUM requirement resulting from the above example of investment advice of an ongoing nature as follows:

    Sum of the most recent 15 months of AUM, excluding the 3 most recent monthly values

    50 + 50 + 75 + 175 + 175 + 225 +225 + 225 + 305 + 350 + 350 + 360 = 2,565

    Average AUM

    2,565 / 12 = 213.75

    K-AUM requirement

    213.75 * 0.0002 = 0.043