Content Options:

Content Options

View Options:

DISP 1.3 Complaints handling rules

DISP 1.3.1RRP

Effective and transparent procedures for the reasonable and prompt handling of complaints must be established, implemented and maintained by:

  1. (1)

    a respondent; and

  2. (2)

    a branch of a UK firm in another EEA State.

[Note: article 10 of the MiFID implementing Directive and article 6(1) of the UCITS implementing Directive]5

DISP 1.3.1ARRP

416These procedures must ensure that a complaint may be made free of charge.

[Note: article 6(3) of the UCITS implementing Directive]5

Procedures for UCITS management companies

DISP 1.3.1BRRP

5A UK UCITS management company must ensure that the procedures it establishes under DISP 1.3.1 R for the reasonable and prompt handling of complaints require that:

  1. (1)

    there are no restrictions on Unitholders exercising their rights in the event that the UCITS is authorised in an EEA State other than the United Kingdom; and

  2. (2)

    Unitholders are allowed to file complaints in any of the official languages of the Home State of the UCITS scheme or EEA UCITS scheme or of any EEA State to which a notification has been transmitted by the competent authority of the scheme's Home State in accordance with article 93 of the UCITS Directive.

[Note: article 15 of the UCITS Directive]

DISP 1.3.2GRP

These procedures should:

  1. (1)

    allow complaints to be made by any reasonable means; and

  2. (2)

    recognise complaints as requiring resolution.

DISP 1.3.2AGRP

416These procedures should, taking into account the nature, scale and complexity of the respondent's business, ensure that lessons learned as a result of determinations by the Ombudsman are effectively applied in future complaint handling, for example by:

  1. (1)

    relaying a determination by the Ombudsman to the individuals in the respondent who handled the complaint and using it in their training and development;

  2. (2)

    analysing any patterns in determinations by the Ombudsman concerning complaints received by the respondent and using this in training and development of the individuals dealing with complaints in the respondent; and

  3. (3)

    analysing guidance produced by the FSA , other relevant regulators and the Financial Ombudsman Service and communicating it to the individuals dealing with complaints in the respondent.

DISP 1.3.3RRP

In respect of complaints that do not relate to MiFID business, a respondent must put in place appropriate management controls and take reasonable steps to ensure that in handling complaints it identifies and remedies any recurring or systemic problems, for example, by:

1
  1. (1)

    analysing the causes of individual complaints so as to identify root causes common to types of complaint;

  2. (2)

    considering whether such root causes may also affect other processes or products, including those not directly complained of; and

  3. (3)

    correcting, where reasonable to do so, such root causes.

DISP 1.3.3BGRP

4The processes that a firm should have in place in order to comply with DISP 1.3.3 R may include, taking into account the nature, scale and complexity of the firm's business including, in particular, the number of complaints the firm receives:

  1. (1)

    the collection of management information on the causes of complaints and the products and services complaints relate to, including information about complaints that are resolved by the firm by close of business on the business day following its receipt;

  2. (2)

    a process to identify the root causes of complaints (DISP 1.3.3 R (1));

  3. (3)

    a process to prioritise dealing with the root causes of complaints;

  4. (4)

    a process to consider whether the root causes identified may affect other processes or products (DISP 1.3.3 R (2));

  5. (5)

    a process for deciding whether root causes discovered should be corrected and how this should be done (DISP 1.3.3 R (3));

  6. (6)

    regular reporting to the senior personnel where information on recurring or systemic problems may be needed for them to play their part in identifying, measuring, managing and controlling risks of regulatory concern; and

  7. (7)

    keeping records of analysis and decisions taken by senior personnel in response to management information on the root causes of complaints.

DISP 1.3.4G

In respect of complaints that relate to MiFID business, a firm should put in place appropriate management controls and take reasonable steps, in the same way as for complaints that do not relate to MiFID business (see DISP 1.3.3 R and DISP 1.3.3B G), in order to detect and minimise any risk of compliance failures (SYSC 6.1) and to comply with Principle 6 (Customers' interests).4

4
DISP 1.3.5G

[deleted]4

4
DISP 1.3.6GRP

4Where a firm identifies (from its complaints or otherwise) recurring or systemic problems in its provision of, or failure to provide, a financial service, it should (in accordance with Principle 6 (Customers' interests) and to the extent that it applies) consider whether it ought to act with regard to the position of customers who may have suffered detriment from, or been potentially disadvantaged by, such problems but who have not complained and, if so, take appropriate and proportionate measures to ensure that those customers are given appropriate redress or a proper opportunity to obtain it. In particular, the firm should:

  1. (1)

    ascertain the scope and severity of the consumer detriment that might have arisen; and

  2. (2)

    consider whether it is fair and reasonable for the firm to undertake proactively a redress or remediation exercise, which may include contacting customers who have not complained.

DISP 1.3.7RRP
  1. (1)

    4A firm must appoint an individual at the firm, or in the same group as the firm, to have responsibility for oversight of the firm's compliance with DISP 1.

  2. (2)

    The individual appointed must be carrying out agoverning function at the firm or in the same group as the firm.

DISP 1.3.8GRP

4Firms are not required to notify the name of the individual to the FSA or the Financial Ombudsman Service but would be expected to do so promptly on request. There is no bar on a firm appointing different individuals to have the responsibility at different times where this is to accommodate part-time or flexible working.