CASS 6.5 Records, accounts and reconciliations
Records and accounts
1A firm must keep such records and accounts as necessary to enable it at any time and without delay to distinguish safe custody assets2 held for one client from safe custody assets2 held for any other client, and from the firm's own applicable assets.2
[Note: article 16(1)(a) of the MiFID implementing Directive]
2 2 2A firm must maintain its records and accounts in a way that ensures their accuracy, and in particular their correspondence to the safe custody assets2 held for clients.
[Note: article 16(1)(b) of the MiFID implementing Directive]
23A firm must keep a copy of every executed client agreement that includes that firm's right to use safe custody assets for its own account, including in the case of a prime brokerage agreement the disclosure annex referred to in CASS 9.3.1 R.
Record keeping
Internal reconciliation of safe custody assets held for clients2
- (1)
Carrying out internal reconciliations of the safe custody assets2 held for each client with the safe custody assets2 held by the firm and third parties is an important step in the discharge of the firm's obligations under CASS 6.5.2 R (Records and accounts) and,4 where relevant,2SYSC 4.1.1 R (General requirements)4 and SYSC 6.1.1 R (Compliance).4
222 -
(1A)
For a firmacting as trustee or depositary of an AIF that is an authorised AIF, carrying out internal reconciliations of the safe custody assets held for each client with the safe custody assets held by the firm and third parties is an important step in the discharge of the firm's obligations under article 89(1)(b) (Safekeeping duties with regard to assets held in custody) of the AIFMD level 2 regulation and, where relevant, SYSC 4.1.1 R (General requirements) and SYSC 6.1.1 R (Compliance).5
- (2)
A firm should perform such internal reconciliations:
- (a)
as often as is necessary; and
- (b)
as soon as reasonably practicable after the date to which the reconciliation relates;
to ensure the accuracy of the firm's records and accounts.
- (a)
- (3)
Reconciliation methods which can be adopted for these purposes include the 'total count method', which requires that all safe custody assets2 be counted and reconciled as at the same date.
2 -
(4)
If a firm chooses to use an alternative reconciliation method (for example the 'rolling stock method') it needs to ensure that:
- (a)
all of a particular safe custody asset2 are counted and reconciled as at the same date; and
2 - (b)
all safe custody assets2 are counted and reconciled during a period of six months.
2
- (a)
Reconciliations with external records
A firm must conduct on a regular basis, reconciliations between its internal accounts and records and those of any third parties by whom those safe custody assets2 are held.
[Note: article 16(1)(c) of the MiFID implementing Directive]
2Where a firm deposits safe custody assets2 belonging to a client with a third party, in complying with the requirements of CASS 6.5.6 R, the firm should seek to ensure that the third party will deliver to the firm a statement as at a date or dates specified by the firm which details the description and amounts of all the safe custody assets2 credited to the account, and that this statement is delivered in adequate time to allow the firm to carry out the periodic reconciliations required in CASS 6.5.6 R.
2 25If a firmacting as trustee or depositary of an AIF that is an authorised AIF deposits safe custody assets belonging to a client with a third party, under article 89(1)(c) (Safekeeping duties with regard to assets held in custody) of the AIFMD level 2 regulation, the firm should seek to ensure that the third party will deliver to the firm a statement as at a date or dates specified by the firm which details the description and amounts of all the safe custody assets credited to the account, and that this statement is delivered in adequate time to allow the firm to carry out the periodic reconciliations required under article 89(1)(c) (Safekeeping duties with regard to assets held in custody) of the AIFMD level 2 regulation.
Frequency of external reconciliations
A firm should perform the reconciliation required by CASS 6.5.6 R:
- (1)
as regularly as is necessary; and
- (2)
as soon as reasonably practicable after the date to which the reconciliation relates;
to ensure the accuracy of its internal accounts and records against those of third parties by whom safe custody assets2 are held.
25A firmacting as trustee or depositary of an AIF that is an authorised AIF should perform the reconciliation under article 89(1)(c) (Safekeeping duties with regard to assets held in custody) of the AIFMD level 2 regulation:
-
(1)
as regularly as is necessary; and
-
(2)
as soon as reasonably practicable after the date to which the reconciliation relates;
to ensure the accuracy of its internal accounts and records against those of third parties by whom safe custody assets are held.
Independence of person conducting reconciliations
Reconciliation discrepancies
A firm may, where justified, conclude that another person is responsible for an irreconcilable shortfall despite the existence of a dispute with that other person about the unreconciled item. In those circumstances, the firm is not required to make good the shortfall but is expected to take reasonable steps to resolve the position with the other person.
Notification requirements
A firm must inform the FCA in writing without delay:
- (1)
if it has not complied with, or is unable, in any material respect, to comply with the requirements in CASS 6.5.1 R, CASS 6.5.2 R or CASS 6.5.6 R; or
-
(1A)
if it is a firmacting as trustee or depositary of an AIF and has not complied with, or is materially unable to comply with, the requirements in CASS 6.5.1 R and/or articles 89(1)(b) or 89(1)(c) (Safekeeping duties with regard to assets held in custody) of the AIFMD level 2 regulation; or 5
- (2)
if, having carried out a reconciliation, it has not complied with, or is unable, in any material respect, to comply with CASS 6.5.10 R.
Audit of compliance with the custody rules
Firms that use an alternative reconciliation method are reminded that the firm's auditor must confirm to the FCA in writing that the firm has in place systems and controls which are adequate to enable it to use another method effectively (see CASS 6.5.5 R).