Reset to Today

To access the FCA Handbook Archive choose a date between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2004.

Content Options:

Content Options

View Options:

Alternative versions

  1. Point in time
    2016-03-02

APER 4.4 Statement of Principle 4

APER 4.4.1G

[deleted]3

3
APER 4.4.1AGRP

3The Statement of Principle 4 (see APER 2.1A.3 P) is in the following terms: "An approved person must deal with the FCA, the PRA and other regulators in an open and cooperative way and must disclose appropriately any information of which the FCA or the PRA would reasonably expect notice."

APER 4.4.2G

[deleted]3

3
APER 4.4.2AGRP

3For the purpose of this Statement of Principle, regulators in addition to the FCA and the PRA are those which have recognised jurisdiction in relation to regulated activities and a power to call for information from the approved person in connection with his accountable function or (in the case of an individual performing an accountable significant-influence function) in connection with the business for which he is responsible. This may include an exchange or an overseas regulator.

APER 4.4.3ERP

In the opinion of the appropriate regulator,3 conduct of the type described in APER 4.4.4 E, APER 4.4.7 E, or APER 4.4.9 E does not comply with Statement of Principle 4 .3

3
APER 4.4.4ERP

Failing to report promptly in accordance with his firm's internal procedures (or if none exist direct to the regulator concerned),3 information which it would be reasonable to assume would be of material significance to theregulator concerned,3 whether in response to questions or otherwise, falls within APER 4.4.3 E. The regulator concerned is:

33
  1. (1)

    the FCA if it would be reasonable to assume that it would be of material significance to it;3

  2. (2)

    the PRA if it would be reasonable to assume that it would be of material significance to it;3

  3. (3)

    both the FCA and the PRA if it would be reasonable to assume that it would be of material significance to both of them.3

APER 4.4.5GRP

There is no duty on an approved person to report such information directly to the regulator concerned3 unless he is one of the approved persons responsible within the firm for reporting matters to the regulator concerned.3 However, if an approved person takes steps to influence the decision so as not to report to the regulator concerned3 or acts in a way that is intended to obstruct the reporting of the information to the regulator concerned,3 then the appropriate regulator3 will, in respect of that information, view him as being one of those within the firm who has taken on responsibility for deciding whether to report that matter to the regulator concerned.3

333333
APER 4.4.6ERP

In determining whether or not an approved person's conduct under APER 4.4.4 E complies with Statement of Principle 4, the following are factors which, in the opinion of the appropriate regulator,3 are to be taken into account:

3
  1. (1)

    the likely significance to the regulator concerned (as defined in APER 4.4.4 E)3 of the information which it was reasonable for the individual to assume;

    3
  2. (2)

    whether the information related to the individual himself or to his firm;

  3. (3)

    whether any decision not to report the matter internally was taken after reasonable enquiry and analysis of the situation.

APER 4.4.7ERP

Where the approved person is, or is one of the approved persons who is, responsible within the firm for reporting matters to the regulator concerned (as defined in APER 4.4.4 E)3, failing promptly to inform the regulator concerned3 of information of which he is aware and which it would be reasonable to assume would be of material significance to the regulator concerned,3 whether in response to questions or otherwise, falls within APER 4.4.3 E.

333
APER 4.4.8ERP

In determining whether or not an approved person's conduct under APER 4.4.7 E complies with Statement of Principle 4,3 the following are factors which, in the opinion of the appropriate regulator,3 are to be taken into account:

3
  1. (1)

    the likely significance of the information to the regulator concerned (as defined in APER 4.4.4 E)3 which it was reasonable for the approved person to assume;

  2. (2)

    whether any decision not to inform the regulator concerned (as defined in APER 4.4.4 E)3 was taken after reasonable enquiry and analysis of the situation.

    3
APER 4.4.9ERP

Failing without good reason to:

  1. (1)

    inform a regulator of information of which the approved person was aware in response to questions from that regulator;

  2. (2)

    attend an interview or answer questions put by a regulator, despite a request or demand having been made;

  3. (3)

    supply a regulator with appropriate documents or information when requested or required to do so and within the time limits attaching to that request or requirement;

falls within APER 4.4.3 E.